tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4479198940709202122.post2992101206934396656..comments2023-02-23T08:37:47.659-05:00Comments on Jiresell Thoughts: The Case Against Lance ArmstrongJiresellhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/01303204737761660697noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4479198940709202122.post-85147662729987669392011-05-27T10:21:10.232-04:002011-05-27T10:21:10.232-04:00I think I can strike that balance, but your commen...I think I can strike that balance, but your comment is right on. If it ultimately proves out that Lanace Armstrong took PED's, does that mean his brand, which was built on his cycling success, is tainted? And if so, is the money raised through his brand ultimately "dirty" money because it was given under the guise that Lance Armstrong had overcome so much for his success through training, peserverance, belief in himself?<br /><br />Bottom line: I can separate the two. If Lance is guilty, the Livestrong foundation ought to find another more worthy spokesman who can truly represent their mission.Jiresellhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/01303204737761660697noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4479198940709202122.post-64174598858802909252011-05-27T00:52:25.350-04:002011-05-27T00:52:25.350-04:00Not sure what balance you're talking about, Ji...Not sure what balance you're talking about, Jiresell. Are you implying that you can't simultaneously show respect the Livestrong Foundation and disapproval of Armstrong's alleged cheating, but must find a balance between the two? Why would you think that?<br /><br />-TCAnonymousnoreply@blogger.com